Additional Details:

Kim Cavitt’s presentation on Medical Decision Making and Documentation in Audiology offers a comprehensive guide for audiologists on effective and compliant documentation practices essential for clinical care, legal protection, and reimbursement. She emphasizes that documentation must be chronological, complete, legible, and reflect all aspects of a patient’s healthcare journey, from subjective complaints to objective findings, diagnosis, and treatment. This record not only facilitates patient care and interprofessional communication but also supports the revenue cycle, evidencing medical necessity and enabling accurate billing.

Dr. Cavitt defines diagnosis as the process of synthesizing subjective and objective data to determine a health condition, and treatment as the interventions aimed at managing or resolving that condition. She insists that every action—like otoscopy—must be documented to be considered performed. Documentation tools range from electronic health records (EHR) to templates and dictation software, with a strong recommendation to move away from paper charts. She details how Medicare and other payers require clear justification—particularly regarding medical necessity—for services rendered, including diagnosis codes, place of service, and individualized treatment plans. Audiologists must also document outcomes and progress, especially in cases involving hearing aids, implants, and tinnitus.

A critical framework Dr. Cavitt introduces is the SOAP note format—Subjective, Objective, Assessment, and Plan—as a practical model for organizing clinical documentation. She underscores the importance of documenting comprehensive case histories, including review of systems, medications, social and family histories, and environmental exposures. She details how to document objective audiologic data, such as test results, screening outcomes, and instrumentation used, and provides examples to link findings with medical necessity and treatment decisions.

Dr. Cavitt explores specific documentation requirements by Medicare, Medicaid, and commercial insurers, including state-specific mandates for newborn hearing screening, workers’ compensation, and hearing aid dispensing. She also addresses Evaluation and Management (E/M) coding, its history, regulatory framework, and its limited applicability to audiology, recommending that audiologists verify their state licensure and scope of practice before utilizing these codes.

In sum, Dr. Cavitt advocates for meticulous, timely documentation that reflects the full scope of audiologic care and supports both clinical and administrative processes. Her message is clear: good documentation is good medicine—and vital for ensuring patient-centered care, professional credibility, and financial sustainability.

Additional Resources:

• Obtain CE Credit